Identity (in) formation

Before the presentation, I met my simultaneous translator who helped later with questions and answers, as well as the entire text of the two other presentations! Photo by Iuliia Zadorozhnia.

I delivered my paper to the Ukrainian Catholic University Journalism Faculty’s Conference on Media and Identity first thing, first day.

My paper, “Identity (in)formation: Analyzing internet media materials in the context of EURO 2012 for evidence of a new Ukraine” prompted a rousing 1.5-hour discussion among the invited professors and students. This is the first formal result of my Fulbright-year research.

My analysis of UEFA.com materials from Ukraine’s perspective of attractive tourists and business investment suggests the tournament will be bitter disappointment. While Poland and Ukraine are co-hosting the tournament and depicted as “twins” in UEFA communication strategy, the “twins” treatment does not control for a critical variable: the significant disparity in communication know-how and sales savvy in Ukraine compared to Poland. Poland reveals its advantage in an interactive travel planning program and links that Ukraine’s parallel links match with information with no effective choice or buy-through options. Even the alphabet works against Ukraine: travellers have bought transportation and hotels in Poland before they find out anything about Ukraine. I had two offers of publication from conference participants.

The most significant discussion occurred with regard to my discussion of the gap between what Ukrainians know to be true about independent Ukraine and what Westerners perceive about Ukraine, essentially as one of a sea of “former Soviet” republics. Not only does Ukraine have to make a strong persuasive case for tourism and business development, but it has to differentiate itself as a country separate from Russia and break through the information-poor stereotype of Westerners’ attitudes towards “countries of the former Soviet Union.” The idea that, even though it has collapsed, the Soviet Union is alive and well in news and other credible rhetorical references to Ukraine and other 20-years’ independent states.

The discussion was exhilarating. On top of it all, my four cheerleaders (mom, Adam, Zachary, and Bill) were invited to stay for lunch!

Advertisements

8 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

8 responses to “Identity (in) formation

  1. Pat Burton

    So glad that your presentation went well and that your cheerleaders were there for you! Give our love to them all! The photos of “Mum” you posted were wonderful!

    • My presentation was real thrill for me, because the audience was so engaged. I was also proud with my use of visuals instead of points, which speaks to my interest in visual rhetoric as well as intercultural communication. Now, if only I can get the rights to those photos to include them with the print publication.

  2. Gabriela Ostendorfer

    Bravo, Leanne! What a fabulous experience for all of you!

    • Yes, Adam even asked pertinent related questions at lunch! He is growing up. Zachary may read the long version when he grows up… Bill suggested a few changes, which may already be i the long written version. I have to check. Publication seems assured, however. That is great in the academic world!

  3. paula

    I see a consulting opportunity in your future 🙂 They will benefit greatly from exposure to your astute insights.

  4. paula

    p.s. Love to all!!

    • You’re gonna have to be in charge of Zachary and Bill from there, now! Adam just wrote Gaby a postcard from here or Warsaw — of course, he may get there before it does.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s